Walnuts Continued from Page 1
Global walnut production
said signs point to a slow, incremental recovery, which means “we’ve still got a long way to go.” Moving forward, he said he hopes growers take a cautious and healthy approach so that they don’t overplant again and “shoot ourselves in the foot.” “We have got to be smart about how we incrementally grow and build this industry back up,” Barton said. (Ching Lee is an assistant editor of Ag Alert. She may be contacted at clee@cfbf.com.)
have started to rebound, he said, though not as much as growers would like, largely due to the record size of the crop and the difficulty of moving such volumes. Magaña said he expects production will return to more normal levels in the next few years, weather permitting, with more trees being pulled. This will allow the industry to be “in a more favorable supply-demand balance,” though prices will probably remain below break even for most growers, he added. The slowing production trend is hap- pening not just in California but in other major walnut-producing regions such as Chile and China, RaboResearch reported. Globally, walnut supplies are expected to be stable or declining in the next few years, Magaña said. In Chile, where walnut plantings have been increasing for the past two decades, growers have started to cut acreage after years of declining prices and impacts from adverse weather, which reduced this year’s crop by 30% after record volumes last year. China, the world’s largest producer and consumer of walnuts, also is not expect- ed to increase production in the next few years, Magaña said. Once a net importer of walnuts, China has become a net exporter in recent years, changing the dynamics of the industry, he added. Even so, Magaña said he expects the U.S. and Chile will maintain a compet- itive advantage over China because of their reputation for high-quality nuts, especially with ongoing efforts by the California walnut sector to increase de- mand and consumption. “That is going to help support pric- es and profitability in years to come,” Magaña said. He said he considers Chile to be a “friendly competitor” of California due to its counter-seasonal production in the Southern Hemisphere. With its product commanding a premium, Chile could potentially create more demand for walnuts by helping to provide consis- tent, year-round supplies of the tree nut, Magaña added. He noted how other agricultural sectors such as avocados and blueberries have grown consumption due to wider product availability. With Chilean supplies in key markets such as Europe and Asia, there is opportunity “to change consumer per- ception that walnuts are mostly a season- al item and mostly a baking ingredient,” Magaña said. He stressed the importance of not just promoting walnut consumption but how it is eaten. Diversifying walnut consumption to snacking, in food-service channels and in manufactured products will help the industry absorb larger volumes, he said. Increasing export demand also remains critical, Magaña said. With India’s expand- ing middle class and its substantial vege- tarian population, he said he thinks walnut exporters are “just scratching the surface” in the southeast Asian market, noting India has already become the main destination for California almonds.
3,000
2,250
1,500
750
POWERS ELECTRIC PRODUCTS COMPANY
0
2005/ 2006
2007/ 2008
2009/ 2010
2011/ 2012
2013/ 2014
2015/ 2016
2017/ 2018
2019/ 2020
2021/ 2022
2023/ 2024*
China
US
Chile
EU
Ukraine
Turkey
India
Moldova Other
Source: USDA, RaboResearch 2024
*2024 crop estimated
But India has its own walnut production, which the Indian government protects via hefty tariffs on all walnut imports. Chile has been working to remove those tariffs for its nuts. While the U.S. successfully got India to remove the Trump-era retaliatory tariffs last year, all imported walnuts still face 100% tariffs. If they can be lifted, “then India will be way more attractive as an ex- port destination,” Magaña said. Looking at state production, Brian Fedora, a Sutter County walnut grower and processor, said he has seen Sacramento Valley growers move away from high- er-density plantings, which allow growers in the early years of an orchard achieve higher yields more quickly when young trees begin to produce. But the hedgerow-style plantings tend to choke each other out once the trees be- come bigger, he said, with yields falling or trees not producing as much as expected in the long term. Planting twice as many trees to the acre also gets costly, he said. “Then it didn’t look like the economics were panning out quite like what the mod- el stated,” Fedora said. Regardless of planting density, Fedora said with the development of new root- stocks for different soil types and the way farmers use fertilizers, amendments and spacing, the science of growing walnuts has become so advanced that “we’re getting better production than we’ve ever gotten.” Now that older varieties such as Serr, Payne and Vina have fallen out of favor and are being pushed out, three varieties have come to dominate California walnut orchards: Chandler, Howard and Tulare. There are a few newer varieties, Fedora said, but they’re largely unproven. San Joaquin County grower Josh Barton, whose family also processes and markets walnuts, said questions remain about the harvestability, yield, color and kernel size of the newer varieties. But “people have their eyes” on a couple of them, including Ivanhoe and Wolfskill, which his farm has planted recently to diversify its portfolio. “Being reliant on just three varieties is not great for the industry,” he said.
But it will take time to prove the sustain- ability of the new varieties and whether they will be accepted globally, he acknowl- edged. Color remains the “driving force of marketability,” Barton said, but early har- vest timing is also important to growers be- cause the later the harvest, the greater risk of inclement weather wrecking the crop. “If you can get something off earlier than a Chandler and it’s going to be light in color like a Chandler, then you’ve hit the lottery,” he said. Though analysts and people in the wal- nut business largely agree the industry is starting to rebound from significant chal- lenges during the past few years, Barton
Body 15% OFF FOR ACTIVE MEMBERS OF THE FARM BUREAU
ORDER TODAY PEPCO2000@COMCAST.NET 559-275-3030 WWW.POWERSELECTRIC.COM
Agricultural Market Review Quotations are the latest available for the week ending August 9, 2024 Year Ago Week Ago Latest Week Livestock
Slaughter Steers – 5-Area Average Select & Choice, 1250–1450 lbs., $/cwt. Hogs – Average hog, 51-52% lean, Iowa-Minn. market, $/cwt. Slaughter Lambs – $ per cwt. 170–215 lbs. National weekly live sales Field crops – basis prompt shipment Cotton – ¢ per lb., Middling 1 3/32” Fresno spot market Corn – U.S. No. 2 yellow $/bu. trucked Alfalfa Hay – $ per ton, quality * , FOB Region 1, Northern Inter-mountain
179-180
187-188
185-186
100.02
91.74
88.90
180-223
195
196
80.77
72.58
71.42
7.81
5.79
5.77
360 (P) 240 (P) 380 (S)
185 (P/S)
290 (S)
Region 2, Sacramento Valley
180 (P) 220 (P) 290 (P)
10 (P, per bale)
Region 3, Northern San Joaquin Valley Region 4, Central San Joaquin Valley
300 (S) 290 (P)
350 (P/S) No quote
Region 5, Southern California Region 6, Southeast Interior
No quote 17 (P, per bale)
260-285 (P)
200-220 (P)
200-240 (P)
Rice – Milled #1 Head, FOB No. Calif. mills Medium grain, $ per cwt.
70-72
30-32
30-32
Provided by the California Farm Bureau as a service to Farm Bureau members. Information supplied by the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Market News Branch. * ADF=Acid detergent fiber; (S) = Supreme/<27%ADF; (P) = Premium/27-29; (G) = Good/29-32; (F) = Fair/32-35.
August 14, 2024 Ag Alert 17
Powered by FlippingBook