Data tool emerges as water-rights threat is defeated
By Alexandra Biering In the past several years, the equity and effectiveness of California’s water-rights system and the California State Water Resources Control Board’s ability to enforce it have come un- der scrutiny from activists and envi- ronmental inter- est groups. This scrutiny increased following docu- mented violations of the agency’s water curtailment orders in August 2022. Alexandra Biering At the outset of 2023, California law- makers responded by introducing three water-rights “reform” bills to increase the state water board’s oversight and enforce- ment authorities in the exercise of any type of water right. Ultimately, only one such bill—Senate Bill 389 by state Sen. Ben Allen, D-Santa Monica—has successfully landed on the desk of Gov. Gavin Newsom. The other two water-rights bills, Assembly Bill 460 by Assembly Member Rebecca Bauer-Kahan, D-Orinda, and AB 1337 by Assembly Member Buffy Wicks, D-Oakland, failed to gather enough votes to pass this year. The governor has until Oct. 14 to veto SB 389. Otherwise, it will become law. Current law, under Section 1051 of the California Water Code, authorizes the wa- ter board to investigate and collect infor- mation about the state’s water resources and the claims people have made to use them. This includes investigating all rivers, stream systems, lakes or other bodies of water and ascertaining whether the waters are already appropriated under state law. It also includes determining all water rights
water code, titled “Determination of Basis of Right.” That would have given the water board the authority to adopt new regula- tions to investigate rights. It also would have given the board power to declare wa- ter rights “forfeited” with little due process. The earlier bill would also have put the entire burden of proof on the water-rights holder to demonstrate the validity of that right under the information order. As some senior water rights date to the Gold Rush era or earlier, records of these rights can be difficult to document quickly, all but setting up many people for failure under this provision. Although California Farm Bureau was initially opposed to SB 389, we and doz- ens of other water and agricultural groups dropped our opposition after the author negotiated changes to the bill that re- moved all of these provisions, changed the bill’s focus and substantially reduced the risk to water users. Whereas SB 389 was once an enforce- ment tool, it’s now an informational and data-collection tool—albeit one that could still inform enforcement if it uncovers di- rect evidence of wrongdoing. The informa- tion collected under SB 389 will be a com- plement to the state water board’s recently launched Updating Water Rights Data—or UPWARD—effort. UPWARD is a $63-million push to digi- tize a century’s worth of water-rights data and records, make them available to the public, and inform transparent and da- ta-driven water management decisions to help remove the guesswork and politics from the board’s critical task to balance all beneficial water uses. That would be a welcome step. (Alexandra Biering is a senior policy ad- vocate for the California Farm Bureau. She may be contacted at abiering@cfbf.com.)
Senate Bill 389 could have imposed burdens on senior water-rights holders to document rights dating back as far as the Gold Rush. But those provisions were dropped from the final bill language.
on a stream system if requested to do so by a party that claims rights to use the stream, river, lake or other body. The law allows state water board staff to do these things, in part, by issuing in- formation orders to request details from water-rights holders. This section of the water code is silent as to whether the wa- ter board’s power to ask for information extends to California’s most senior water rights, pre-1914 and riparian rights. The ambiguity no doubt has kept many water rights attorneys employed over the years. As passed by the Legislature, SB 389 simply clarifies the water board’s pow- ers under California Water Code Section 1051. It says that the agency may collect information about all surface water rights in the state, including pre-1914, riparian and post-1914 licensed or permitted water rights. It also allows the state board to send information orders to water-rights holders at will, rather than only doing so at the re- quest of another water-rights holder. It also
clarifies the types of information that can be requested. However, the bill places a burden of proof on the water board by requiring that the information order explain the need for the information and include support- ing evidence. It requires that the order be executed by the board’s executive direc- tor instead of staff. These provisions are important to ensure the orders are issued only when truly necessary, rather than ca- priciously or for political purposes. Finally, it affirms that the water board can take action against unauthorized water diverters—a power the board already has in California Water Code Section 1052. Earlier versions of SB 389 included very troubling provisions for California’s farm- ers, ranchers and other water users. The bill appeared to be squarely focused on giving the water board aggressive new en- forcement powers. The first version of the bill would have added an entirely new section to the
VOL. 50, NO. 36
October 4, 2023
AG ALERT ® weekly newspaper is an official publication of the CALIFORNIA FARM BUREAU
www.agalert.com www.cfbf.com
@cafarmbureau @cafarmbureau @cafarmbureau
@calfarmbureau
Board of Directors (District 1) Ronnie Leimgruber; (2) Scott Hudson; (3) Richard Miner; (4) Kevin Merrill; (5) Brian Medeiros; (6) Joey Airoso; (7) Donny Rollin; (8) April England; (9) Jay Mahil; (10) Jan Garrod; (11) Joe Martinez; (12) Paul Sanguinetti; (13) Ron Peterson; (14) Joe Fischer; (15) Clark Becker; (16) Garrett Driver; (17) Johnnie White; (18) Daniel Suenram; (19) Taylor Hagata; (20) Jim Morris; (21) Ronald Vevoda; (Young Farmers & Ranchers Committee Chair) Leah Groves. Advisory Members Al Stehly, Chair, CFB Rural Health Department, Glenda Humiston, University of California Cooperative Extension. Letters to the editor: Send to agalert@cfbf.com or Ag Alert, Attn: Editor, 2600 River Plaza Drive, Sacramento, CA 95833. Include name, address, phone number, email address; 250-word limit.
Melanie Duval- Chief Marketing Officer
ADVERTISING: Brock Tessandori- Business Development Manager (916) 561-5585 Antonio Muniz- Sales Coordinator Classifieds: (916) 561-5570 2600 River Plaza Dr., Sacramento, CA 95833. Represented in the East and Midwest by J.L. Farmakis, Inc. Eastern office: Bill Farmakis 48 Topfield Rd., Wilton, CT 06897 (203) 834-8832; Fax: (203) 834-8825. Midwest office: Russ Parker , P.O. Box 7, Albia, IA 52531 (641) 946-7646, Bob Brunker , 8209 NW 81st Ct., Kansas City, MO 64152 (816) 746-8814, Jennifer Saylor , 8426 N. Winfield Ave., Kansas City, MO 64153 (816) 912-2804, Laura Rustmann , 901 Lands End Cir, St. Charles MO 63304, (636) 238-8548. AG ALERT (issn 0161-5408) is published weekly except weeks of Memorial Day, July 4, Thanksgiving,
Christmas; and with exceptions, by the California Farm Bureau, 2600 River Plaza Dr., Sacramento CA 95833 (telephone: (916) 561-5570). Periodicals postage paid at Sacramento, California. POSTMASTER: Send address changes to AG ALERT, 2600 River Plaza Dr., Sacramento, CA 95833. The California Farm Bureau does not assume responsibility for statements by advertisers or for products advertised in AG ALERT nor does the Federation assume responsibility for statements or expressions of opinion other than in editorials or in articles showing authorship by an officer, director, or employee of the California Farm Bureau Federation or its affiliates. No alcohol, tobacco or political ad-
Peter Hecht- Chief Editor, Publications
Christine Souza- Assistant Editor
Ching Lee- Assistant Editor
Caleb Hampton- Assistant Editor
Shawn Collins- Production Designer
Paula Erath- Graphic Designer
Nicole Pacheco- Graphic Designer
vertising will be accepted. Jamie Johansson , President
GENERAL INFORMATION: (916) 561-5570
Shannon Douglass , First Vice President Shaun Crook , Second Vice President
agalert@cfbf.com
Printed on Recycled Paper
BPA Business Publication Member
2 Ag Alert October 4, 2023
Powered by FlippingBook