Farm groups ‘troubled’ by court’s bumblebee ruling By Ching Lee
the insect protection as fish. Unlike federal law, the state ESA does not include insects as eligible for listing. Specifically, state law extends protections only to birds, mammals, fish, amphibians, reptiles and plants. Nevertheless, the California Fish and Game Commission voted in 2019 to des- ignate the Crotch bumblebee, Franklin’s bumblebee, Suckley cuckoo bumblebee and western bumblebee as candidates for
ESA listing. The move triggered full protec- tion for the bumblebees under state law, which prohibits actions that would kill, or “take,” candidate species without a permit or other authorization. The state based its listing decision on a provision of the Fish and Game code, which defines fish to include invertebrates. Because bumblebees and other insects are invertebrates, the commission argued, then they may be
listed under the state ESA. Farm groups, including the California Farm Bureau, sued, saying that bumble- bees are not fish and that the commission abused its authority by adding the spe- cies as candidates for state ESA protection. They also contend that protections for the bumblebees could affect farming activities in the state, including grazing and growing crops, herbicide and pesticide applica- tions, and use of commercial honeybees to pollinate crops. The trial court sided with farmers. It re- jected the state’s argument, saying that the Fish and Game Code’s definition of “fish” applies only to marine invertebrates, not to terrestrial insects such as bumblebees. Subsequently, the state and three environ- mental groups appealed. In last week’s ruling, the appellate court said it took a more “liberal interpretation” of the law, which it said was intended to be read more broadly to cover all imperiled invertebrate species, including bees. “Although the term ‘fish’ is colloquial- ly and commonly understood to refer to aquatic species,” the court said, “the term of art employed by the Legislature in the definition of fish … is not so limited.” The court agreed that the law “is am- biguous as to whether the Legislature in- tended for the definition of fish to apply to purely aquatic species.” But it concluded that legislative history supports its liberal interpretation: The commission had previ- ously listed a terrestrial mollusk and inver- tebrate—the Trinity bristle snail—and two crustaceans as endangered or threatened. California Farm Bureau Senior Counsel Kari Fisher said the organization is “trou- bled” by the appeal court’s decision and is “evaluating potential next steps.” Farm groups said the court disre- garded prior positions of the Office of Administrative Law, the Office of the Attorney General, and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, all of which concluded that insects cannot be protected under the state ESA. The state Legislature in 1984 consid- ered a bill that would have added insects and plants to the categories of protected species, farm groups pointed out, and it expressly decided to add plants but not in- sects. Reports of the committees that pro- duced the legislation also plainly stated that insects cannot be listed, the groups said. The ruling could complicate existing efforts to manage farmland to protect wildlife, they added. What’s more, the case could set a precedent and inspire ad- ditional petitions to list other insects such as the monarch butterfly under the state ESA, they said. In addition to the Farm Bureau, oth- er farm groups party to the case are the Almond Alliance of California, California Association of Pest Control Advisers, California Citrus Mutual, California Cotton Ginners and Growers Association, Western Agricultural Processors Association, Western Growers Association and The Wonderful Company. (Ching Lee is an assistant editor of Ag Alert. She may be contacted at clee@cfbf.com.)
Saying that bumblebees may be classi- fied as fish, a state appeals court has ruled that the pollinator insect may therefore be eligible for protection as an endangered or threatened species under state law. The ruling, issued last week, revers- es a 2020 Sacramento County Superior Court decision blocking the state from listing the bumblebee under the state Endangered Species Act and granting
Enter FOR A Chance to Win Cash Prizes!
Grand prize $1,000 1st runner-up $500 2nd runner-up $250 3rd runner-up $100
Submit your dog’s photo and a short story about why your dog is an integral part of your farm or ranch.
Enter the contest today: cfbf.com/farmdogcontest Contest open from May 1 - June 30
The contest is open only to Farm Bureau members. Applicants who are not Farm Bureau members can visit cfbf.com/join to learn about becoming a member.
4 Ag Alert June 8, 2022
Powered by FlippingBook