Groundwater Continued from Page 1 results” such as land subsidence and household wells running dry. In the San Joaquin Valley, where the aquifers are especially depleted, prevent- ing those outcomes requires major chang- es ahead of the law’s final deadline. Groundwater agencies covering much of the valley adopted pumping limits, or allocations, within the past few years as the state began cracking down on subbasins with inadequate plans. On the eastern side of the Turlock Sub- basin, where Burroughs farms, growers are limited this year to 1.6 acre-feet of ground- water per acre, with hefty fees imposed on excess use. Almonds, the area’s top crop, typically require 3 to 4 acre-feet of water per acre. “We are truly in the difficult part of SGMA,” said Stacie Ann Silva, principal at Altum Aqua Logic, a Fresno-based water consulting firm that monitors more than 90 groundwater agencies across the state. “As allocations continue to ramp down, landowners are going to have to make harder decisions.” The pumping reductions required by SGMA could cause as much as 20% of the San Joaquin Valley’s farmland to be taken out of production by 2040, ac- cording to a report by the Public Policy Institute of California. Experts who track groundwater sus- tainability and land use said that trans- formation has begun. Last year, orchard removal companies in the San Joaquin Valley could not keep up with demand, particularly in the areas most affected by pumping restrictions, according to a Feb- ruary report by the California chapter of the American Society of Farm Managers and Rural Appraisers. With pumping limits tightening in some areas and growers bracing for a dry year with less surface water, Silva said she ex- pects fallowed acreage “is going to start to grow exponentially.”
Looking ahead SGMA’s implementation in the San Joaquin Valley could indicate some of the challenges that await farmers in other parts of the state. Silva said new guidelines for manag- ing subsidence have prompted “a grow- ing conversation” among groundwater agencies in parts of the Sacramento Valley about adopting pumping limits next year. She added that proactive growers and water managers in the San Joaquin Valley have found some solutions, however diffi- cult, that could be replicated elsewhere. In multiple subbasins, they got buy-in from landowners and other growers to assess fees that have been used to add surface water supplies, recharge aquifers, com- pensate fallowing and mitigate ongoing impacts of overdraft. Burroughs, whose family has farmed in California for more than a century, encour- aged farmers to “communicate and work together” to preserve agriculture. All around her, she said, growers are grappling with the possibility of losing their farms due to SGMA and other challenges. “When you’ve grown up on a farm and seen what your parents and grandparents have done,” Burroughs said, “and now you’re the generation that the farm clos- es—because of nothing to do with you or what you put into it—it affects every aspect of your life and well-being.” Caleb Hampton is an editor at Ag Alert. He can be reached at champton@cfbf.com.
Farming impacts Alexandra Biering, a water policy expert and director of policy advocacy for the Cal- ifornia Farm Bureau, said that while stabi- lizing the state’s aquifers is critical, doing so will be painful for farmers. Some growers have made strategic decisions to voluntarily fallow acreage, sacrificing part of their business as they make long-term adjustments to comply with SGMA. But for others, financial stress caused by rising costs, low crop prices and SGMA has accelerated fallowing. In recent years, as groundwater agencies released their allocation timelines, many parcels slated for steep pumping cuts lost more than half their value as the real estate market priced in a future in which that land lacks enough water to produce lucrative crops, according to the ASFMRA report. Real estate underpins many of the loans farmers rely on to develop new orchards and pay farming costs. According to grow- er testimony before state regulators, the drop in land values caused banks to cut off new lending, and in some cases—when lenders became overextended—to call long-term mortgage loans due, plunging farmers into financial ruin. In the eastern Turlock Subbasin, which relies heavily on groundwater, it is project- ed that 22,000 acres, about a quarter of the area’s farmland, will need to be fallowed— or repurposed to non-irrigated uses—in the next decade and a half as growers cut their groundwater use by 40%. Nearly half that amount of land—about 10,000 acres—was taken out of produc- tion just in the past year, according to the Eastern Turlock Subbasin Groundwater Sustainability Agency. Mike Tietze, the agency’s general man- ager, said foreclosures caused some or- chards to be taken out, and other ground was left fallow because growers were de- nied loans to plant new trees. “They had to fallow because of econom- ic conditions,” Tietze said. Burroughs said one of her family
members, whose farm neighbors her own, removed an old almond orchard more than two years ago and has been unable to get a loan to plant new trees. Ripple effects Economists have warned the water cuts required by SGMA will impact not only farmers but send ripple effects through communities, while ecologists have cau- tioned that unmanaged fallowing could turn the nation’s top farming region into a dusty patchwork. “There’s a lot at risk,” said Silva, the wa- ter consultant. Implementation of the law, coupled with anticipated surface water reductions, could result in the San Joaquin Valley los- ing 42,000 jobs and more than $1 billion a year in worker wages, with the impact be- ing “disproportionately large in the valley’s lowest-income communities,” according to a University of California, Berkeley, study. The researchers projected the loss of economic activity will cost city and coun- ty governments $242 million a year, im- pacting the budgets of schools, fire depart- ments and other public services. While there are some state-funded grant programs to help landowners repurpose farmland, advocates said the scale of SGMA’s impact dwarfs any available relief. “It’s been a constant battle to try to en- sure that people understand what it means and what it will inevitably entail,” said Bi- ering, the Farm Bureau policy advocate.
Calling on the Capitol Series Farm Bureau Members, Your Voice Matters – Join us for a legislative visit to the Capitol this spring! Lobby Days are your opportunity to meet directly with legislators and staff, share your story, and advocate for the policies that impact you. Whether you’re a seasoned advocate or brand new to Farm Bureau engagement, we want you at the table. Never participated before? That’s okay — this is the perfect place to start. We provide issue briefings, talking points, and staff support to ensure you feel confident and prepared. Your voice matters, and personal stories are often the most powerful message legislators hear. Make your voice heard at the Capitol! Calaveras, San Joaquin, Stanislaus, Tuolumne,
MAY 26, 2026 Districts 12-21
Amador, El Dorado, Placer, Sacramento, Butte, Nevada, Yuba-Sutter, Colusa, Glenn, Yolo, Marin, Napa, Sonoma, Lake, Mendocino, Lassen, Modoc, Plumas-Sierra, Shasta, Siskiyou, Tehama, Trinity, Del Norte, Humboldt
Sponsored by
Scan to Register cfbf.com/ capitol
May 6, 2026 Ag Alert 13
Powered by FlippingBook